Phone: 775-786-2366Fax: 775-322-9105
100 West Liberty, Suite 800 P.O. Box 2838 Reno NV 89501 U.S.A. Washoe Co. View Map

Guild, Russell, Gallagher & Fuller, Ltd.

Areas Of Practice

  • Administrative Law
  • Appellate Court Practice and Public Utility Law
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Corporation
More

Business

Initial Public Offerings & the Securities Act of 1933
An Introduction to the Securities Act of 1933 More...
Anti-Competitive Discrimination By Sellers Under the Clayton Act
The federal Clayton Act contains prohibitions against various specific anti-competitive practices and is designed to supplement the broad prohibitions of the Sherman Act against anti-competitive agreements and monopolization. Section 2 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.S. § 13, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, specifically prohibits discrimination in the price of commodities or in commissions, allowances, services, or facilities if such discrimination is anti-competitive. More...
Federal Antitrust Actions by States
States are "persons" within the meaning of the Clayton Act and are entitled to bring actions on their own behalf for damages resulting to State property from violation of provisions of federal antitrust laws. For example, a state may bring a federal antitrust action for treble damages against companies that agreed on what bids would be made on a state construction project. More...
Mutual Fund Prospectus Comparable Information Requirements
(Mutual Fund Prospectus Comparable Information Requirements) More...
Premerger Notification Under Section 7A of the Clayton Act
Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.S. § 18a, requires advance notice to federal antitrust enforcement agencies of mergers and acquisitions over a certain size. Pre-merger notification rules must be complied with and notice must be given to the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice before the merger or acquisition may become effective. Those agencies have the option upon receiving proper notification to impose an additional waiting period upon the parties to the transaction in order for the agencies to evaluate any potential effect on competition or tendency toward a monopoly that would suggest an enforcement action to have the merger or acquisition enjoined. More...

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Guild, Russell, Gallagher & Fuller website is powered by LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell®. || Sitemap